đłď¸ Is this the most consequential election in Oakland history?
Newsom orders encampment closures and changes to police chase policy, deep dive on Oakland crime data, Harbin-Forte enters City Attorney race
Happy Sunday, Oakland. This is the first issue of the revamped Empower Oakland newsletter. For those who missed it, check out our âre-launchâ post or catch us on KTVU!
â° Reminder: 100 days to election day! (check your voter registration below)
Whatâs at stake this November
The recalls are historical firsts: neither an Oakland Mayor nor an Alameda County DA has ever been recalled. And in total, 14 key positions are on the ballot. They will wield enormous power.
Alameda County District Attorney Recall
2 Alameda County Supervisors (D4, D5)
Oakland Mayoral Recall
Oakland City AttorneyÂ
5 of 8 Oakland City Council seats (1, 3, 5, 7, At-Large)
4 of 7 school board seats (1, 3, 5, 7)
It would typically take 3-4 election cycles to reshape the political landscape at this level. For anyone unhappy with Oaklandâs current direction, this is an unprecedented opportunity for change.
Unlike national elections, Oakland's politics aren't Democrat vs. Republican. In a city where just 5% of registered voters are Republican, the policy and ideological differences can be much more nuanced.
In any case, we know the top priorities for every candidate will focus on the current crises: public safety, housing, homelessness, and the local economy. Here are just a few examples of the signals to watch:
Public safety: filling sworn police officer vacancies vs. investing solely in violence prevention programs
Housing: making it easier to build all types of housing vs. prioritizing only affordable rental housing
Public services: maximizing impact and efficiency of public services vs. being unwilling to negotiate for concessions from labor union partners
Some choices may seem more obvious than others, but they are all underscored by our tenuous budget situation. If the Mayorâs plan to sell the Coliseum doesnât happen (no deal is currently guaranteed), Oakland will be forced to cut $63M in spending, including 78 police officers and five fire companies â and our $100M+ deficit will inevitably worsen.
Whatâs really at stake?
Whatâs really at stake is the speed and certainty of Oaklandâs rebound. The sheer number of elected positions on the ballot could deliver unprecedented change in leadership.
But left on its current path, these things are certain: Oaklandâs budget deficit gets wider. Families continue to leave. School enrollment declines. Even more businesses shut or leave. Crime continues unabated. More innocent lives will be senselessly lost. And the cycle goes on.
Story of the week
Governor Newsom issued an executive order to remove homeless encampments in California, saying there are âno more excusesâ for local inaction. This comes after the U.S. Supreme Courtâs decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson, which gave the âdefinitive authorityâ to state and local officials to clear unsafe encampments.
Now the pressureâs on local leaders to take action. Oakland officials have been reluctant to take such measures, so all eyes should be on those leaders (and candidates!). Oaklandâs homeless population is ~5,500 (double since 2015), despite spending more money.
In other newsâŚ
âMy Oakland City Council colleagues think they can pay recurring bills with a one-time sports deal â but we canât afford the overdraft fees.â â Janani Ramachandran, District 4
Oakland council member Janani Ramachandran penned a scathing op-ed in response to the Mayor fast-tracking a budget thatâs contingent on a sale of the Coliseum. She says that even with a Coliseum sale â which is a no-bid contract and far from a done deal â weâre just pushing Oaklandâs financial problems down the road (East Bay Times)
Gavin Newsom sent a letter urging Oakland leaders to revise the cityâs police pursuit policy to let officers chase suspects more frequently. He called Oakland an âoutlierâ in its inability to chase suspects (SF Chronicle)
Former Alameda County judge Brenda Harbin-Forte filed papers to run for City Attorney. She is currently leading the recall effort against Sheng Thao. After retiring as a judge, Harbin-Forte served on the Oakland Police Commission, until Thao removed her from the job last year (Mercury News)
The Oakland Report broke down Oaklandâs crime data, and how politicians are playing games with public safety (Oakland Report)
A new neighborhood group thinks private investment can fix the area north of Lake Merritt (SF Chronicle)
Fremont Police arrested a man suspected of killing his girlfriend, while out on bail for separate charges for attempted murder and assault. DA Pam Price did not seek enhancements for the prior charges, which is why he was allowed bail (KRON4)
â
Are you ready to vote?
Election Day (Nov 5) is just 100 days away, and vote-by-mail (VBM) ballots arrive in only 70 days. Here are easy links to confirm the following:
Voter registration (update your mailing address!)
Support us
If youâd like to support us, please consider donating to Empower Oakland Committee, the campaign arm of Empower Oakland. Funds will be used for data-driven advertising programs to reach Oakland voters.
If youâre interested in volunteering, just reply to this email. Weâre looking for founders and operators interested in content creation, web design, and social/digital marketing.




I was just carjacked and robbed at gunpoint Thursday night at 1AM right in front of my building. The police came and were very nice and extremely apologetic that they couldnât âchaseâ although we had trackers that actually showed exactly where some items were. I actually felt bad for them. They want to be officers of the law. They want to enforce the law but are not permitted to. No wonder we canât even recruit to fill the few slots we can afford to pay for. This city and its officials have betrayed its citizens. This election may be crucial. Although itâs hard to imagine being able to regain control of this chaos. In any case, vote the current officials out, for sure.
I'm not sure what kind of organization would pay more than $100 million for half of the Coliseum site when the A's own the other half. I think the whole deal is a mirage. "Forget it Jake, it's Thao."